Sign up to receive information and Resources from NCCTQ.
Ahluwalia, M. (2005, December). How much should schools pay for teachers? Catalyst Chicago, XVII(4), 11, 15. Retrieved March 6, 2006, from http://www.catalyst-chicago.org/news/index.php?item=1838&cat;=25.
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2004). Analyzing the determinants of the matching of public school teachers to jobs: Estimating compensating differentials in imperfect labor markets. Albany, NY: Teacher Policy Research. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.teacherpolicyresearch.org/portals/ 1/pdfs/Matching_of_Public_School_Teachers_to_Jobs.pdf
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.teacherpolicyresearch.org/portals/ 1/pdfs/The_Draw_of_Home_%28JPAM%29.pdf
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. (2003). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Durham, NC: Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.pubpol.duke.edu/people/faculty/clotfelter/eer-novice12-03.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the "highly qualified teacher" challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33/v11n33.pdf
Education Law Center. (2004). Complaint to the Office for Civil Rights concerning teacher distribution in the Philadelphia school district. Philadelphia: Author. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.schoolfunding.info/states/pa/ElcOcrComplaint.pdf
The Education Trust. (2000). Honor in the boxcar: Equalizing teacher quality. Thinking K–16, 4(1),1–2. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/ E0A47827-6FA9-4BAD-A157-60ABB852F51A/0/k16_spring2000.pdf
The Education Trust–West. (2005). California's hidden teacher spending gap: How state and district budgeting practices shortchange poor and minority students and their schools. Oakland, CA: Author. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.hiddengap.org/resources/report031105.pdf
Epstein, K. K. (2005). The unreported consequences of regulations which claim to create "highly qualified" teachers. Teachers College Record, 107(2).
Futernick, K. (2003). TQI: A teacher qualification index for California's schools. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.edfordemocracy.org/tqi/index.htm
Goe, L. (2002). Legislating equity: The distribution of emergency permit teachers in California. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(42). Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n42/
Guin, K. (2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42). Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n42/v12n42.pdf
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2001). Why public schools lose teachers (NBER Working Paper No. 8599). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Haycock, K. (2002/2003). Toward a fair distribution of teacher talent. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 11–15.
Hirsch, E. (2001). Teacher recruitment: Staffing classrooms with quality teachers. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.nga.org/Files/pdf/RECRUITMENT.pdf
Hirsch, E. (2005). Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions: A report to Governor Mike Easley on the 2004 North Carolina teacher working conditions survey. Chapel Hill, NC: Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.teachingquality.org/pdfs/TWC_FullReport.pdf
Humphrey, D. C., Koppich, J. E., & Hough, H. J. (2005). Sharing the wealth: National Board certified teachers and the students who need them most. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(18). Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n18/v13n18.pdf
Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E., & Donaldson, M. L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers' early experiences in high-income and low-income schools. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61). Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n61/v12n61.pdf
Keller, B. (2005). Conferees mull best uses of NBPTS teachers. Education Week, 24(28), 3, 15.
Levin, J., Mulhern, J., & Schunck, J. (2005). Unintended consequences: The case for reforming the staffing rules in urban teachers union contracts. New York: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.tntp.org/newreport/ TNTP%20Unintended%20Consequences.pdf
National Commission for Teaching and America's Future. (2002). Unraveling the "teacher shortage" problem: Teacher retention is the key. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.ncsu.edu/mentorjunction/ text_files/teacher_retentionsymposium.pdf
National Partnership for Teaching in At-Risk Schools. (2005). Qualified teachers for at-risk schools: A national imperative. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/quality/partnership.pdf
Presley, J. B., & White, B. R., & Gong, Y. (2005). Examining the distribution and impact of teacher quality in Illinois(IERC 2005-2). Edwardsville, IL: Illinois Education Research Council. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://ierc.siue.edu/documents/ Teacher%20Quality%20IERC%202005-2.pdf
Rotherham, A. (2005, March 30). Credit where it's due. Education Week. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&subsecID=135&contentID=253264
Roza, M., & Hill, P. T. (2004). How within-district spending inequities help some schools to fail. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings Papers on Education Policy: 2004 (pp. 201–228). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.crpe.org/pubs/pdf/InequitiesRozaHillchapter.pdf
Roza, M., Evans, D. J. (2005, February). Many a slip 'tween cup and lip: District fiscal practices and their effect on school spending. Prepared for the Aspen Institute Congressional Program: The Challenge of Education Reform: Standards, Accountability, Resources and Policy, Aspen, CO. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.crpe.org/workingpapers/pdf/ Roza_AspenInstitute.pdf
Pre-Webcast PresentationsMarch 27, 2006
In preparation for the live, interactive Webcast, participants are invited to view online presentations that outline the issues or problems relating to equitable distribution of teachers. Presentations from three experts will be available, representing research, policy, and practice perspectives, beginning March 27, 2006.
Live WebcastMarch 30, 2006
On March 30, beginning at 2 p.m. EST, three experts will explore promising solutions to the challenges associated with the equitable distribution of teachers. As with the pre-Webcast presentations, the experts will represent research, policy, and practice perspectives.
Online Discussion ForumMarch 30-31, 2006
Immediately following the Webcast, participants will be able to log into an online discussion forum to dialogue with the panelists and other participants on this topic. The online discussion forum will be active until 5:00 EST on March 31, 2006.
Funding provided by the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Views and opinions expressed by participants of the Webcast or in the accompanying readings are not to be interpreted as the views of the funding agency or its partner organizations.